So many members of his own party do not want him to become him PM and they silently wish that court will embroil him in some cases.

Ruling Party hates idea of NAMO becoming PM.

Fine. I am not a political person. I am a lawyer. And I am writing this from a lawyer’s perspective.

1) I want to tell you one truth, “Directly From the Mouth of Horse“
2) Then I want to tell you how I see sum total of all cases cases against Modi.
3) Then I want to tell you how I felt in 2002 when there were riots in Gujarat.
4) Then I want to tell you how I feel today about Gujarat.

FIRST,”Truth Directly From the Mouth of Horse”

I don’t remember the date. It was many many years ago. But I was called by National Human Right Commission.

I signed in entry register. A pass was made. I was allowed to go to a particular room. The whole complex(Old Comples) was heavily guarded from inside too. Lobbies were empty except guards.

In one room I was asked to wait.

On the otherside of room one Lady-Riot-fighter-Social worker was sitting.
An illiterate lady, a riot victim was called from Baroda
.
She was being tutored on how and what to say in an affidavit for which she was called.

Then the officer came. He said purpose for which I was called now does not exist. So I left and forgot the issue.

After some months, I learned that Supreme Court had pulled up this activist fighting for riot victims and the riot victim lady from Baroda for filing false affidavit.

The point which I wish to make is, if what I saw was correct, then,


TUTORING of these ladies for filing false affidavit, was done in rooms National Human Rights Commission.


Since then, I have always doubt about credibility of what National Human Right Commission is doing. I also read somewhere that International body of Human Rights Commission has given a very low rank to performance of National Human Right Commission of India.

SECOND  POINT: 

Total Legal effect of ALL CASES against Modi.


Everyone wants to know this.

The NAMO’s Chances of becoming PM depends on this..!
Bettors would like to bet fortunes on this speculations.
Foreigners would like to invest in India on basis of these predictions.

Well, I look at sum total of all legal cases in this way.

Take a big pot.

Now put all allegations made against Modi in this pot.
Then put all evidences against Modi in this Pot.
Then put all evidence collected by Banerjee Commission and Nanavati Commission in this pot.
Then Put all Newspaper, TV Reports and Tehleka reports in this pot.
Then put all affidavits filed in SC and HC in this Pot.
Put everything you find against Modi in this pot,

Now boil all these and a KHICHARI will be ready.

Following will be the summary of KHICHARI

1) There is no direct evidence against Modi. (If I am not wrong)


No one has seen that ‘Modi Came out in Gallery of his house and said, “Let There Be Riots” and the riots broke out.

There is no such DIRECT EVIDENCE.

2) Then, all these allegations and evidence will fall in SECOND CATEGORY of CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

To convict a person on basis of Circumstantial Evidence, Three Things Have to be Established in a Court of Law;

1)  There is a Chain of Event and each link of chain is proved beyond doubt. If one of the link is broken, missing or not proved, the conviction cannot be made. In this case, everyone is speaking about one or two pieces from here and there.

I have not read any article on evidence which explains this chain and its each link.

2) Omission to Do a Thing, is even more difficult to prove with circumstantial evidences.

3) And even at the end of day, if there are two views possible, one view which is favourable to accused is to be accept by Court.

Here his lawyers will certainly argue that even if omission to do  something is found, it can be as well considered as an Error of Judgement by a Chief Minister, which does not attract criminal liability.

4) Now about Amicus Curie, appoianted by Court, who gave report that CM made some provocative statement, and therefore some prosecution can lie. May be he is right.Or may be he is wrong.

But this is out of context. It is like reporting that driving license of Modi is fake.! The main issue is skipped! So what if it is fake! I don’t think Modi drives any car.

5) Public Interest of matters against Modi has now changed COMPLETELY.

In 2002, it may be public interest. But now these are all litigation for persecution at the instance political stakeholders. Now there is no more any public Interest in these matters. Only short sighted political leaders and journalists are vexing on this.

NOW THIRD POINT, WHAT I  FELT ABOUT  GUJARAT IN 2002.


I am not a modi-sympathizer. I am also not against him..

In 2002, about 40 Kar Sevaks were burnt.

Riots took place.

I wrote and circulated following poem: