A good High Court Judge should not inflict Pillory Punishment on advocates appearing before him

Standard

It is settled law that Judges should not pass strictures on advocates appearing before him. Nor on judges of lower court.

And yet many times it is seen that a High Court judge, while dictating judgement, in the judgement, passes negative comments on advocate who may have appeared in case.

Such comments amount to Pillory Punishment- punishment in present of peers of advocate.

When such comments are brought to notice of Supreme Court, it promptly strikes of such comments from the judgement.

However, this spoils atmosphere of mutual respect between judge and Bar.

Sometimes Judges as well as lawyers are suffering from Blood Pressure or Diabetes. It is possible for them to suddenly flare up in course of arguments.

But this should not lead to dictating unfair comments in judgement.

Haresh Raichura
26/9/2012

Dengue- PIL Writ petition ought to be filed in Delhi High Court

Standard

Law of writ is simple. If Executive is not doing what it is supposed to do, High Court’s and Supreme Court can issue directions.

Today’s front page news item on Dengue – Ticking Bomb in Times of India is alarming.

As per my personal view, some public interested reputed body ought to move Delhi High Court.

Haresh Raichura
25/9/2012