What could be the fate of Janlokpal or Lokpal Bill in next few days ?

Standard
In next few days, debate over Lokpal or JanLokpal will start in Rajyasabha.

Opposition parties will have their way. Probably they will delete all provisions which may authorize Central Government to appoint Lokayukts in States.

The Ameded bill called, Amended Lokpal Bill will go to Lower House( Loksabha), which can reject all amendments suggest by RajyaSabha, or amend it further and pass the same. It will have last word.

Sometimes, at the same time debate may start in Supreme Court as to whether Appointment made by Gujarat Governor of Lokayukt in Gujarat is Constitutional.

These are important issues for nation. Everyone will be focused on the issue.

METAPHORS FOR THE ISSUE

“Mr. UPA, Kindly Hang Thyself?” – Says Team Anna

The issues, can be seen by using a little crude metaphor.

Team Anna gave a rope clalled Janlok Pal Bill and asked UPA Government that it is duty of the ruling party to commit suicide. Kindly pass the Bill.

DILEMMA  FOR UPA

If the Lokpal bill will be kept at center level only, then a thousand complaints, partly true and partly imaginary, will be filed against ministers of UPA.

Once the complaints are filed, Media will be 24/7 busy playing and replaying these unproved allegations.
Even if the allegations are unproved,  the shipof UPA Govt.will start sinking.

They thought, ‘when our ship is sinking, let us sink all ships of opposition parties also’.

If Lokayukts arelso a appointed in State Governments where UPA is not in power, then there also a thousand complaints will be filed against Ministers of opposition parties.

So loss at center may be offset by gain in other states.


The UPA may think about a third option also!

Let us try to pass bill as originally as passed by Loksabha after giving some nominal inconsequential concessions to opposition.

This bill will not be acceptable to any party that Lokayukts be appointed by Central Government to States. 

So the UPA Government may declare Mid-term polls.

Now, UPA can tell voters that ,” Look, we tried to pass Lokpal bill, but opposition did not allow us to pass it. Please vote for us and give us 2/3 Majority so that we can give a Constitutional Lokpal.”

Opposition Parties will tell people,” Look, UPA never intended to pass a STRONG LOKPAL bill. It wanted to destroy Fedaral Structure. So give us vote. We will give you a clean corruption free government and a STRONG LOKPAL BILL.

Team Anna, will say to voters,” Look, STRONG LOKPAL is the cry of nation. Vote only those who support STRONG JANPLOKPAL BILL.

At the very same time, unexpectedly,  heineous crimes may to increase in Opposition Ruled states.

In fighting in UP will become intense. Law and order will deteriorate.

 And people will think, Look, UPA is the only strong party. It has atleast an internal discipline to follow what High Command says. And since, now UPA has projected a DALIT PRIME MINISTER CARD, let us go with them.

 This may be the picture unfording.

 Haresh Raichura

Judges said, "First You Learn to Tell Lies, if you want to to become a Lawyer"

Standard
 Judges said, “First You Learn to Tell Lies”


30 Years Ago. I had joined as lawyer since hardly a month.

A poor lady, a daily worker was removed from a central government job.

I prepared a petition saying that she has been wrongly removed on such a such date and stay order may be granted to enable her to continue to work as daily worker.

The matter came before two judges of Central Tribunal at Ahmedabad.

They said I should withdraw this petition and file a better petition again after consulting some friends.

They did not tell me what was wrong in my petition. They forced me to withdraw case and gave liberty to file fresh case after consulting friends..

Friends told me, I should not have written that the Lady worker has already been removed from job. I should have written that “she is still continuing in job but since she is likely to be removed, stay may be granted.”

Then only Judges can grant you stay order that she may be continued further.

I said, “Isn’t it perjury? Isn’t it telling lie on oath and filing false affidavit“.

Nobody has answered me. But that is the way things are done even today. Will some one in Judiciary answer my question.

Incident 2

Judge said, “Don’t tell your opponent a liar. There is nothing wrong in telling lies in pleadings. He states his case, you state your case”


About 8 to 10 Years ago:

I was appearing before the Chairman of National Consumer Forum. New Delhi. I do not remember name.

Insurance company had filed an appeal. The Manager of Insurance Company has filed deliberate false affidavit,giving wrong facts,  because of which my client had to fight for years an appeal which had no merit.

Since years, my clients money were blocked by Insurance company by filing a false affidavit of facts.

I was very very angry. I asked Judge for perjury notice against manager of Insurance Company which had sworn a false affidavit.

The Chairman was wiser than me. He had seen more of this world more than me. He pacified me. Asked me to calm down.

Then he saw lines which I  had pointed out. Then said, ” Oh, there is nothing like perjury in it. He states his case. You state your case. If he has made wrong statement you can deny it.”

In other words, he said he can state his lies and I can state my lies also. It is for court to decide who is right.

Why judges take false statements on oath very lightly?


I heard a retired Judge saying that so many people are telling lies on oath that if we start taking proceedings of perjury against them, arrears of Judiciary will go upto 6 Crore from 3 Crores.

Well, that is that to that as of now.

Someone my blog commented that “Lawyers are liars.”.
Well, I have tried to give some answer.

Harseh Raichura