Main LEGAL between 2G and CoalGate Allotment- Difference between Fraud and Fraudulent Policy and Powers of Court to Cancel allotment

Standard

I am not a Legal Eagle. I am a very low profile advocate. But I see difference between 2G and Coalgate.

First Principle of Law

Court has full power to set aside “Decision Making Process”

but

has limited power to cancel a “policy of Government.”

2G Scam

Here some people were given advance information on Declaration of policy of First Come First Served. When policy was declared, some people had already prepared bank drafts for deposit money. It was an outright fraudulent act, confirmed by subsequent transfers of licenses.

Therefore, Supreme Court has power to cancel it.

COALGATE

Here, a policy was there.

Policy was not challenged for years by anyone.

A screening committee was appointed for examining merits of case.

Only those licenses can be cancelled where 1) False details are given 2) Collusion with members of screen committee is found.

AND IF YOU WANT TO

If you want to cancel all CoalGate licenses, you have to further prove that (1) Policy was fraudulent (2) Entire Screening Committee functioned in fraudulent manner (3) No criteria was fixed (4) Kickbacks are visible. (5) Screen Committee was just a MASK (6) What you cannot do directly, you cannot do it indirectly by setting up a Committee.

This is a tough legal task.

Haresh Raichura
8/9/2012

What to do if wife Files false cases against husband and in- laws?

Standard

Judicial Bias

The trend of judiciary is Pro-Woman. Judges will not readily believe that a woman can also be lying and can be filing false cases against the husband and in-laws.

First Principle:

Judge will look for evidence. If you have no evidence, the judge will believe whatever the woman may say.

Transfer Matters

If husband and wife are from different states, and if cases are filed by husband in his state, Supreme Court will most probably transfer all his cases to where wife is living

Wisdom Versus Law

In family disputes, judges go more by their wisdom and social trends than by law.

When dice is heavily loaded against husband in Courts, the laws are much abused.

No standard advice is available. Judges decide on basis of evidence on record on case to case basis.

1)Husband first need to collect and establish evidences against wife.

Letters, tape recording, video recording. Whatever. A local trial court advocate may advise you properly. Seek his advice also about obtaining factual report from a detective agency.

2) It is always advisable to deposit some amount monthly in bank account of wife. It is always a duty of husband to maintain wife and children.

3) Take first step in Civil Court.

The wife will probably file false cases in criminal courts. Before she files complaints, husband should approach Civil Court. In Hindu Law there is a section under which judge can refer dispute to mediation or can try to resolve disputes.

4) Accept reality.

One SC judge once said,”Husbands are well advised to obey their wives”. Another SC judge recently said,”It is always a question of accommodation. Accommodate and adjust to your wife or suffer consequences.”

This much is all I can say.

There is no effective remedies to protect husbands against false cases by wives till today. But I do hope that Supreme Court will show us way at earliest.

Haresh Raichura
7/9/2012